If using the 200505-01-01 will nv2 not make the next number 200506-01-02 then 200506-01-03. If this is the case you may be suggesting that at each sub-total (usually at the end of the day on the stmt) we change the middle code: ie: June 1st ends at 200506-01-75, we then type in at the 1st June 2 item 200506-02-01, and then let nv2 increase by one till then end of June 2nd.

Will that keep the reconciled items in the correct sequence to identify the last reconciled sub-total and any error would be from that point down?

Post Edited (07-29-05 10:50)