Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 262 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Printing AP Cheques #12984
    HMah
    Participant

    Thanks Kirk:

    I must have hit the Del key, not Rt Click & Delete. This time it printed ok.

    Thanks

    in reply to: Printing AP Cheques #12978
    HMah
    Participant

    I decided to try and print an ap account with a negative balance. To my surprise it printed the cheque and reconciled all the entries (thereby overpaying the vendor).

    In nv1 it would ignore negative balance accounts. This should be fixed unless there is a method (like the Ctrl F4 in payrun) to turn off printing a negative balance account.

    in reply to: Printing AP Cheques #12977
    HMah
    Participant

    Posted and printed fine (abit slow 23 sec). How do we Edit the template? Most of my clietns still use Dot Matric printers with the 42″ line cheques. They perfer the duplicate cheque with the copy of the signers.

    Found the template 080907, and tried to edit it (deleting the bottom stub). I saved it under a different name and when I tried to print the template was looking for two stubs (and my was of different lengths). Did not see anything which identified ie ENDITEMS which I could delete.

    Is there a single stub cheque template (for ap and bank cheques)?

    in reply to: Printing AP Cheques #12418
    HMah
    Participant

    Thanks Bob, but why not allow the process from the report? Same AP account, same entry and the process one follows in nv1. Or should we tell clients not to enter at the report accounts because they would then have to go to the ap account to print?

    in reply to: GST Rounding calculations #12976
    HMah
    Participant

    Make the gst 7.01% oranother amount which creates the result desired, but will remain close to 7% when compared to the lump sum calculation.

    in reply to: Rev Can Audit #12860
    HMah
    Participant

    Martin:

    The PRREPORT does not provide the breakdown of specific remittance cheques (listing the employee cheques and amounts).

    Does the nv2 withholdings_payable?

    in reply to: Atype ALL accounts ? #12969
    HMah
    Participant

    I would select the Asset for work in progress (is no asset category, select inventory) and Expense for cost of goods.

    Post Edited (08-04-05 14:43)

    in reply to: INVOICING #12806
    HMah
    Participant

    You say the invoices are entered at a journal. Did you set the journal as a Debit item? So when you enter the invoice at the distribution positive numbers go to the revenue codes.

    Then when you run TAXS to apply gst you select the AR code which is recorded as a negative on the journal (ie: plus $500 in Dist and Minus $500 to ar code)

    Then when you block the 2 lines(actually only need to block the plus amt) and run PRTINVS, it should print the invoice and pick up the address from the notes view of the ar.

    When you enter the inventory items sold in the distribution, what account code are you selecting? A revenue code or the inventory item?

    in reply to: Bank Reconciliation Search #12962
    HMah
    Participant

    Great, I suggest you add the process to the Manual as an example to follow.

    Users entering a non-separated code will have no problems until they make errors and try to find them. Which could be difficult, like the original “R” entry.

    ps: I have converted and will test it.

    Thanks

    in reply to: Bank Reconciliation Search #12960
    HMah
    Participant

    Martin:

    If using the 200505-01-01 will nv2 not make the next number 200506-01-02 then 200506-01-03. If this is the case you may be suggesting that at each sub-total (usually at the end of the day on the stmt) we change the middle code: ie: June 1st ends at 200506-01-75, we then type in at the 1st June 2 item 200506-02-01, and then let nv2 increase by one till then end of June 2nd.

    Will that keep the reconciled items in the correct sequence to identify the last reconciled sub-total and any error would be from that point down?

    Post Edited (07-29-05 10:50)

    in reply to: Bank Reconciliation Search #12957
    HMah
    Participant

    Thanks, I’ll try it. The other items was the code. ie:20050601 for Jun 1, 2005. By increasing the number with every transaction and you have 2000 items on the statement, your last number will be 2005062000. Next month you start with 20050701 and carry on.

    When you make a mistake and have reconciled 50 items since the last sub-total on the statement how do you find the error. In nv1 we switched to the XR view (which sorted by the code , we used 2050601, 2050602,etc changing the code with each sub-total) and went to the last or previous reconciled balance. The error was from that point down.

    In nv2 using the example above if you sort by the reconcile column I’m not sure if items will be sorted correctly, ie: will 20050701 be behind 2005062000?

    The other problem is in nv2 with a different code for each item reconciled, you don’t have a clear idea of the Reconcile points as we did with nv1 (in nv1 we only changed the code at a sub-total which matched).

    in reply to: NVEXPORT #12955
    HMah
    Participant

    Talk to Bob Halpin, if anyone can help he will.

    in reply to: NVEXPORT #12953
    HMah
    Participant

    NVEXPORT cannot be used to export selective transactions.

    Don’t believe thay have completed the Import procedures.

    Are you using a different payroll than nv1 or nv2?

    in reply to: Suggestions (Not criticism) #12944
    HMah
    Participant

    It seems that most nv2 users are phoning QWP when they have problems or questions (as I often do). QWP is also heavy into the training sessions and hopefully busy upgrading nv2.

    However, by posting in the forum, it allows others to benefit from the answers and get a feel for how nv2 works (or dosen’t).

    I’ve also tried to post from the point of view of my users. Most are extremely busy (posting from 500 to 2000 transactions per day), limited in their accounting and computer skills, and not interested in most of the advanced options which nv2 offers.

    Before they convert, they expect nv2 to function as easy as nv1, increase their productivity, and be easy to learn.

    in reply to: Vacation Withheld account #12856
    HMah
    Participant

    Technically you may be correct, however, Rev Canada and the auditors are both aware of the practice being followed. The only question was whether we reported the earnings correctly when preparing T4’s. In fact because Holiday Pay is included as part of Gross Rev Canada includes the amount when assessing EI and CPP at year end.

    So the question is can they process holiday in the same manner in nv2 as they have being in nv1?

    ie: 4% holiday added to the gross, deductions taken, 4% Holiday Held (accured) deducted from gross. When employees want their Accured Vacation we write a cheque to the Vacation Held account, or Edit the current pay cheque (before printing) by adding an amount coded to Vacation Held?

    Post Edited (07-06-05 14:32)

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 262 total)